The Administrative Procedure Act requires the publication of substantive policy statements issued by agencies (A.R.S. § 41-1013(B)(14).
Substantive policy statements are written expressions which inform the general public of an agency's current approach to rule or regulation practice. Substantive policy statements are advisory only. A substantive policy statement does not include internal procedural documents that only affect the internal procedures of the agency and does not impose additional requirements or penalties on regulated parties or include confidential information or rules made in accordance with the Arizona Administrative Procedure Act. If you believe that a substantive policy statement does impose additional requirements or penalties on regulated parties you may petition the Agency under A.R.S. § 41-1033 for a review of the statement.
Multi-Pane Glazing Assemblies As It Relates To The Standards Of Professional Pr | Subject: Multi-pane glazing assemblies as it relates to the Standards of Professional Practice for Arizona Home Inspectors provision 11.2 B. |
Land Surveying Public Records Repositories In Arizona (EFF. 10/23/2018) | Subject: Land Surveying Public Records Repositories in Arizona |
Whether Acting As An Expert Witness Constitutes “Engineering Practice” Unde | This policy statement was rescinded February 27, 2018 |
Referring Tradesmen To Identify And/Or Correct Adverse Conditions (EFF. 1/26/2016) | This policy was rescinded February 26, 2019 |
Definition Of "Engineering Practice" (EFF. 11/18/2014) | The Board's statutes define "engineering practice" to include advertising that the person is able to perform or does perform any engineering service or other service recognized by educational authorities as engineering.
|
Guidelines For Board Complaint Resolution (EFF. 5/27/2014) | If the Board finds that the alleged violations of rule or statute are not substantiated, it will dismiss the Complaint. The Board may take non-disciplinary action for errors that are not of sufficient seriousness to merit direct disciplinary action against a licensee. |
Direct Supervision For Sampling And Testing (EFF. 1/24/12) | The Board’s rules provide that Drug Laboratory Site Remediation firms must adhere to the Drug Laboratory Site Remediation Best Standards and Practices pursuant to A.A.C. R4-30-305. |
Survey Monuments In Subdivision (EFF. 2/22/11) | Questions have arisen regarding when subdivisions must be monumented in the context of Section 8, Section 13 of the Arizona Boundary Survey Minimum Standards (adopted by the Board on June 15, 2001 and originally effective in Rules on February 12, 2002), and A.R.S. § 33-105(A). |
System Or Component Source/End Points (EFF. 11/24/09) | Questions have arisen concerning the specified source/end point for a system or component in a home when a system or component is not in the scope of work of the home inspection. |
Requirements For Recording Results Of Survey Drawings (EFF. 6/21/05) | The Board's rules provide that Land Surveyors must adhere to the Arizona Boundary Survey Minimum Standards and with state laws pertaining to the surveyor's area of practice. (A.A.C.R4-30-301(4) and(13), effective August 7, 2004) The Arizona Boundary Survey Minimum Standards at Section 13 provides standards to ensure the recordation of appropriate survey drawings. |
Monumenting Public Landsurvey System Section Or Quarter Section Corners | The Board's rules provide that Land Surveyors must adhere to the Arizona Boundary Survey Minimum Standards and with state laws pertaining to the surveyor's area of practice. A.A.C. R4-30-301(4) and (13) (effective August 7, 2004). The Arizona Boundary Survey Minimum Standards at section 9 provides standards for establishing, replacing or setting boundary monuments. |
Home Inspector Preferred Vendor Or Similar Programs (EFF. 1/13/04) | This policy was rescinded February 26, 2019. |
Dating And Signing Seals And Revisions To Drawings (EFF. 12/9/02) | Questions have been received concerning to the dating of a registrant’s seal on professional documents when original documents are sealed and when revisions are made to professional documents after they have been sealed and signed by the registrant. After reviewing Board statutes and rules, including R4-30-304, as well as A.R.S. |
Home Inspector Financial Assurance Bond Language (EFF. 8/20/02) | Questions have been brought forward relating to language that will be acceptable to the Board, for use in issuing bonds as financial assurance for home inspectors as provided in A.R.S. § 32-122.02. |
Use Of Electronic Seals And Signatures (EFF. 6/17/02) | Questions have been brought forward relating to the use of electronic seals and signatures on professional documents. After reviewing Board statutes and rules, including R4-30-304, as well as A.R.S. § 32-125 (E), A.R.S. § 41-132 and A.R.S. § 44-7001 through A.R.S. § 44-7043, the Board developed this substantive policy statement. |
Sealing Of Standard Details (EFF. 6/17/02) | Questions have been brought forward relating to the legality of a registrant signing and sealing standard details and specifications formally adopted by a political jurisdiction, to show they have been reviewed and accepted by the registrant. |
Fire Sprinklers And Fire Alarm Systems (EFF. 3/18/02) | Questions have been brought forward relating to roles of registrants and non-registered persons in preparing design documents for fire sprinkler, fire alarm, and other code regulated alarm systems. This substantive policy statement is offered as guidance to persons interpreting Board statutes and rules.
|
Interpretation Of Term "Total Cost Of Such Construction" (EFF. 3/9/01) | Questions have been brought forward relating to the term "total cost of such construction", as contained in A.R.S. § 32-144(A)(6), and what the Board of Technical Registration (Board) has interpreted this term to encompass. After reviewing its statutes, the Board developed this substantive policy statement. |
Alteration of Plans During Plan Checks (EFF. 5/30/97) | Questions have also been brought forward relating to the altering of sealed plans by building officials during the plan review check process. After reviewing its statutes and rules, the Board developed this substantive policy statement. This substantive policy statement is offered as guidance to persons interpreting Board statutes and rules.
|